BMW GINA Light Visionary Model Concept Car

Back


MORE INFO:

Channel: Autos & Vehicles
Uploaded: June 12, 2008 at 4:42 am
Author: worldcarfans

Length: 00:03:59
Rating: 4.76
Views: 483576

Tags: BMW GINA Light Visionary Model Concept Car

Embed Code:


Video Comments:
SnW (November 28, 2008 at 4:51 pm)
that looks scary, it looks like an organic machine or something, and also reminds me the T-1000
BavarianGiants (November 28, 2008 at 8:11 am)
omg!!! This car is awesome. Great job BMW.
gwfrog (November 23, 2008 at 6:10 am)
This really is genius.
Because of such creativity we (the next generation) get new ideas or can build up ther own ideas how a car has to look like.
Concept cars aren t only to get attantion
they really show what is possibal to do and what has to be solved to get it on the streets.
i love this car
ps.look at audi the new car TT oder R8 look a kind like a ConceptCar as well 8D
coyoteshark (November 19, 2008 at 6:54 pm)
Neat Idea, BMW Roadster Transformer!
BMW/Zeppelin Mutant go!
KimiFerrariversion1 (November 14, 2008 at 1:21 pm)
3:30
hitami (November 12, 2008 at 10:48 am)
El coche fantástico..:D
20051470 (November 9, 2008 at 6:29 pm)
It's a great concept, but there are a lot of issues to be solved like stability and noise in medium/high speeds, durability, feaseability (commercialy)... i dont think something like this will reach production lines anytime soon. But that's good anyway it's what pushes us forward ;)
stryfe420 (November 15, 2008 at 2:06 am)
Issues to be solved? What they're demonstrating with this car is never intended to be for production. This is purely the result of the kind of exercises design houses do to stimulate creativity and draw attention to the company. Talking about possible production issues is like talking about the drawbacks of trying to ride a statue.
20051470 (November 15, 2008 at 10:19 am)
I agree.But art and design are different.This has a purpose.Design always goes way beyond feaseability, it's meant to incite progress, test new ideas and give a glimpse of the future.However this doesn't mean that this technology wont be used in the future(perhaps even near future).I was just saying that,like most concepts, we wont be seeing anything like this on the streets anytime soon, specially something this bold. It's true that art still played a major role in this concept
20051470 (November 15, 2008 at 10:28 am)
I guess i didn't express myself correctly but that was what i meant. still this is not pure art. pure arts only purpose is to "be", this is more than a "statue". this is a materialization of an idea with purposes of making a statement, the demonstration of a possibility.who knows? it might end in a drawer or it might be used by some visionary builder