Open Sourcing Free Energy Technology

Back


- Sterling D. Allan, CEO of Pure Energy Systems Network, and founder of the New Energy Congress, gives the captone presentation on Aug. 11, 2007 at the Gnomedex conference in Seattle. He speaks about the process of screening for the best clean energy technologies, and suggests the open source approach for breaking the logjam on some of the more revolutionary technologies. He defines "free energy" as referring to energy modalities that harness energy that does not have to be paid for, including conventional methods such as solar, wind, geothermal, and tide; as well as the exotic approaches, including cold fusion, zero point energy, and magnet motors. He expects that some of these more exotic forms could bring the price of energy down several-fold, while also being clean and renewable. He recommends the open source method for quickly disseminating the technology once it is mature enough.

Channel: Howto & Style
Uploaded: September 14, 2007 at 8:54 pm
Author: lockergnome

Length: 00:35:51
Rating: 4.42
Views: 48449

Tags: video alternative pirillo tech tv lockergnome gnomelocker allan sterlingallan energy pure freeenergy renewable

Embed Code:


Video Comments:
paraipanakos (November 21, 2008 at 5:56 pm)
thanks for putting this out man, you rock
juansjovis (November 19, 2008 at 7:50 pm)
Before they thought Columbus was nuts. The Earth was flat. It had been like this for thousands of years. The reality is whatever rules and laws you have in your head. Maybe you're just one of these many people, who didn't believe Columbus in his time. That was just 500 years ago. Have we suddenly become all-knowing, or are we just arrogant and afraid? We're still the same.
kakoinax (November 19, 2008 at 5:49 pm)
вот пидерасты уже удалили вмдюшку...у кого есть пришлите пожалуйста
doobedoo22 (November 18, 2008 at 12:03 pm)
The speaker is a fraudster. He tries to make the bogus 'free energy' technologies sound legitimate by mentioning them at the same time as wind and wave power, efficiency and conservation.

So: half the things he's talking about work. But he wants you to buy into the the other half.

*sigh*
paraipanakos (November 21, 2008 at 6:19 pm)
for whom you work for ?
paraipanakos (November 21, 2008 at 6:21 pm)
doobedoo22
cheshire03 (November 9, 2008 at 1:16 pm)
I'm not disputing if this guy is a hoaxer, because he may very well be. All I'm arguing is that fusion is something that defies thermodynamics. There is real science proving this, and because of that we can't readily dismiss the idea that no machine could ever do so. Our science continues to grow and we learn new things all the time. To reject something like fusion is to reject our sun, all stars, and even life here on earth. Obviously the laws of thermodynamics need to be re-written.
ecomafia (November 9, 2008 at 3:51 pm)
Fusion is a *very* controversal subject especially outside of sun's temperature ranges.
Should it happen, then, it'll not defy any of thermodynamics because as in fission, mass and energy are related.
Not everyone achieves fusion when stating so.
It hsppens in hi energy physics labs with a mediocre efficiency. The way is long and folks with serious theory approach have their chances.
Frauds as well.
One UNKNOWN case remains Joseph Papp. Feynman could not debunk it 100% I'm puzzled.
cheshire03 (November 9, 2008 at 4:16 pm)
Then why does fusion defy the the most important things about thermodynamics? That is that the output energy of any machine can not exceed the energy put in? Yet a fully functional fusion reactor would do that very thing to a degree that seems impossible. I have faith that one day, humanity will create such a machine. Come to think of it, a fully functinal commercial ready fusion reactor is already in the building stages and is expected to be operational in the next decade.
ecomafia (November 10, 2008 at 2:15 am)
Well Chesh, friend,
You're positively minded, so here's a bit of enlightement on how things work.
To fuse nuclei, take 2 hydrogens, one needs to overcome the "strong force".
Done in tokamaks, nuke blasts and the sun.
All HIGH PRESSURE HIGH ENERGY devices, i.e. very HOT.
None defies energy conservation from relativistic point of view. Mass turns to energy.
Cold fusion is not here yet, at least in a repetitive way.
And hot fusion is "a little too hot".
This is not a "garage project".