Macworld San Francisco 2000-The Mac OS X Introduction (Pt.1)

Back


By request, here is when Steve Jobs introduced Mac OS X for the first time ever. I edited the video myself to show the very best moments of the presentation & split it up into 3 parts on account of youtube's bogus time limit.

Channel: Science & Technology
Uploaded: August 20, 2006 at 10:49 pm
Author: peestandingup

Length: 00:09:34
Rating: 4.74
Views: 231674

Tags: Apple Macworld Keynote Mac Macintosh Steve Jobs Bill Gates Windows OSX Computer ipod imac ibook power macbook pro vista

Embed Code:


Video Comments:
hobsisgrate (November 12, 2008 at 10:13 pm)
steve jobs is a good speaker :D
osquitar9595 (December 1, 2008 at 4:58 pm)
Great speecher ^^
TrojanxInfection (December 2, 2008 at 2:24 pm)
lol...Speecher??

You mean Speaker. lol
osquitar9595 (December 2, 2008 at 9:24 pm)
Nope, I meant Speecher ^^
iLoveiMacs (November 11, 2008 at 3:28 am)
I'm glad they put the Apple Logo on the menu bar back to the far left again.
jadetraveler (November 3, 2008 at 8:51 pm)
I don't think we should have to get used to increasing hardware requirements as much as we've had to do with Windows. If Microsoft hadn't pushed the envelope as much and kept Windows relatively lightweight, imagine how fast and smoothly it would run on today's computers.
Imprezaman555 (November 4, 2008 at 2:07 pm)
why not? computers always need to keep getting better and more powerfull. that is how progress is made.
jadetraveler (November 4, 2008 at 8:38 pm)
The definition of "better" may differ between people. I used Windows Vista briefly, and what I saw was very little significant new features over XP, yet it requires more RAM & hard drive space and a faster CPU and video card. That's not what I would call "better". Vista has a pretty new user interface, which doesn't much matter to me; it also has behind-the-scenes changes that I wonder were really necessary. And your computer can't be much more powerful if the OS uses much of that power.
Imprezaman555 (November 5, 2008 at 5:51 am)
that is very true, better has a completely different def. for diff. ppl with diff needs. however, vista does have alot of extra stuff, mainly in the usr interface. you may not notice because you
a)don't have a computer that is pwrful enough to take advantage of these effects
or
b)havn't compaired them side by side
i have compaired them side by side on a computer that can handle both with xp running inside vitual machine on vista and vista's ui is considerably smoother. i cant really explain it.
jadetraveler (November 5, 2008 at 9:30 am)
Well, I've never been a big fan of resource-intensive user interfaces. While I think XP's Luna interface looks nice, I've tended to disable it to save a little memory and speed. And although Vista's UI looks nice, I'm sure I would do the same thing with Vista. For me, that's just not a "gotta have it" feature.