Large Hadron Collider - The Search For The Higgs [1 of 3]
BackClick Playlist:
On November, 2007 the most complex scientific instrument ever built will be switched on. The Large Hadron Collider promises to recreate the conditions in the early universe. By revisiting the beginning of time, scientists hope to unravel some of the deepest secrets of our Universe.
Within these first few moments the building blocks of the Universe were formed. The search for these fundamental particles has occupied scientists for decades but there remains one particle that has stubbornly refused to appear in any
experiment. The Higgs Boson is so crucial to our understanding of the Universe that it has been dubbed the God particle. It explains how fundamental particles acquire mass, or as one scientist plainly states: "It is what makes stuff
stuff..."
Channel: Science & Technology
Uploaded: May 27, 2007 at 4:48 am
Author: Gravitationalist
Length: 00:10:55
Rating: 4.80
Views: 406224
Tags: Large Hadron Collider LHC Higgs Boson Atlas CERN
Embed Code:
Video Comments:
rndyrhoadsfan (December 2, 2008 at 5:33 pm)
i definitely think this video is way too dramatic...
still interesting information though..
still interesting information though..
ReductioAdAbsurdum (December 1, 2008 at 1:23 pm)
"Do you see any one going to the moon now, NO!"
We've BEEN there! Again, how is fundamental research less valuable that visiting a nearby rock (again)? Answer the question.
"You see a bunch of fuck tards verbally masterbateing about blackholes, and particale pyshics. Dark matter and black matter, anitmatter and blue matter.
its a bunch of bullshit"
Because you don't understand it, it's bullshit?
"the standerd model is wrong"
How the fuck do you think that will change? Prayer?!
We've BEEN there! Again, how is fundamental research less valuable that visiting a nearby rock (again)? Answer the question.
"You see a bunch of fuck tards verbally masterbateing about blackholes, and particale pyshics. Dark matter and black matter, anitmatter and blue matter.
its a bunch of bullshit"
Because you don't understand it, it's bullshit?
"the standerd model is wrong"
How the fuck do you think that will change? Prayer?!
theinsane102 (December 1, 2008 at 1:52 pm)
Look at it this way. We are tiny specs on a tiny spec, that sits on another tiny spec, so what ever we do all this science this argument, your insults do not matter.
All I want is to go to space and explore other universes. Exploration is much more valubale then science.
All I want is to go to space and explore other universes. Exploration is much more valubale then science.
ReductioAdAbsurdum (December 1, 2008 at 2:22 pm)
"All I want is to go to space and explore other universes."
And science is the only way you'll ever get there.
"Exploration is much more valubale then science."
Science IS exploration.
And science is the only way you'll ever get there.
"Exploration is much more valubale then science."
Science IS exploration.
theinsane102 (December 1, 2008 at 7:03 pm)
Ok, Look Humanity has the stars in its future, and that future is too important to be lost under the burden of juvenile folly and ignorant superstition. Alright.
Direwolf56 (December 2, 2008 at 10:04 pm)
what makes you think its wrong smartass?
ReductioAdAbsurdum (December 2, 2008 at 10:34 pm)
"what makes you think its wrong smartass?"
Um, YouTube says you were responding to one of my comments, but you didn't quote what you were talking about, so there's no way to tell what you meant by "it".
Um, YouTube says you were responding to one of my comments, but you didn't quote what you were talking about, so there's no way to tell what you meant by "it".
Direwolf56 (December 3, 2008 at 6:25 pm)
the standard model
ReductioAdAbsurdum (December 3, 2008 at 9:24 pm)
"the standard model"
I never said it was wrong; that was somebody else (the person I was responding to).
But now that you mention it, it looks like it's generally understood that the model has flaws. Doesn't mean it's "wrong" (it represents our current best understanding), but there are some things it doesn't explain and it's rather inelegant, so the search continues for a more fundamental theory.
I never said it was wrong; that was somebody else (the person I was responding to).
But now that you mention it, it looks like it's generally understood that the model has flaws. Doesn't mean it's "wrong" (it represents our current best understanding), but there are some things it doesn't explain and it's rather inelegant, so the search continues for a more fundamental theory.
-
Related Pages:
PSP Wallpapers
search News & Articles
-
Tags:
PSP Sony-PSP PlayStation-Portable PSP-Games PSP-Movies PSP-Download PSP-Accessory PSP-Videos PSP-Camera PSP-Tube PSP-Music PSP-Case PSP-Review PSP-Game-Reviews PSP-Demo PSP-Cheats PSP-Skin Play-Portable-PSP-Station PSP-System PSP-Console PSP-Guide PSP-Tutorial PSP-Trailer PSP-GPS PSP-Repair PSP-Memory PSP-Internet PSP-Battery PSP-DVD Free-PSP PSP-Theme PSP-Firmware PSP-Keyboard PSP-Girl PSP-Code Used-PSP
-
CERNs specialists do not know about the magnetic trap yet. If microscopic magnetic trap will be made in CERN's LHC, the Earth will be transformed into an infinitely thin emptiness, surrounded by circular current of 6 meter radius. Compare: Schwarzschild radius of such mass is 0,009 meters